Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. GGG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and GGG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSGGG
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationGraco Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningMachinery
Market Capitalization12.81 billion USD14.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and GGG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. GGG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSGGG
5-Day Price Return5.21%1.01%
13-Week Price Return-11.16%-1.17%
26-Week Price Return29.83%0.43%
52-Week Price Return54.42%-3.06%
Month-to-Date Return1.93%-0.50%
Year-to-Date Return44.68%0.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.22M0.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.97M0.71M
3-Month Volatility38.81%18.22%
Beta1.501.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GGG

19.16%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

GGG’s Return on Equity of 19.16% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GGG

22.26%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

GGG’s Net Profit Margin of 22.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GGG

26.63%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places GGG in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSGGG
Return on Equity (TTM)21.35%19.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.20%15.86%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%22.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.14%26.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.71%52.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GGG

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

GGG’s Current Ratio of 3.55 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GGG

0.01

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, GGG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GGG

209.37

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 209.37, GGG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Machinery industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSGGG
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.653.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.012.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.14209.37

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. GGG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. GGG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.33%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.33% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GGG

1.27%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

GGG’s Dividend Yield of 1.27% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GGG

36.94%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

GGG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.94% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSGGG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.33%1.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.36%36.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

32.94

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 32.94 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GGG

28.98

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

GGG’s P/E Ratio of 28.98 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.30

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.30 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GGG

6.45

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 6.45, GGG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GGG

5.76

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

GGG’s P/B Ratio of 5.76 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRS vs. GGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSGGG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.9428.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.306.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.295.76
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.2922.99