Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSGFL
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationGFL Environmental Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization12.16 billion USD18.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSGFL
5-Day Price Return0.00%2.45%
13-Week Price Return6.92%4.24%
26-Week Price Return14.81%7.59%
52-Week Price Return70.01%22.88%
Month-to-Date Return-3.11%1.12%
Year-to-Date Return42.38%10.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.75M0.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.96M0.36M
3-Month Volatility35.57%21.50%
Beta1.520.65

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)21.35%48.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.20%18.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%49.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.14%5.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.71%20.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.650.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.010.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.14-0.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.34%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFL

0.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.12% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.34%0.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.36%0.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

31.90

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 31.90 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL

7.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 7.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.17

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFL

3.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRS vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.907.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.173.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.293.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.9376.39