Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. GE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and GE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSGE
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationGE Aerospace
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization12.45 billion USD285.11 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and GE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. GE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSGE
5-Day Price Return-1.73%-1.16%
13-Week Price Return15.44%22.80%
26-Week Price Return31.61%30.48%
52-Week Price Return79.73%61.12%
Month-to-Date Return0.32%-0.82%
Year-to-Date Return47.42%61.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.15M4.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M6.65M
3-Month Volatility36.32%24.29%
Beta1.521.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.09%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GE

40.51%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

GE’s Return on Equity of 40.51% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

12.26%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GE

18.64%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.64% places GE in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

16.39%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.39% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GE

15.53%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

GE’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.53% is around the midpoint for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSGE
Return on Equity (TTM)21.09%40.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.82%6.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%18.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.39%15.53%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.52%35.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.75

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.75 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GE

1.04

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

GE’s Current Ratio of 1.04 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.39

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GE

0.99

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

GE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99 is typical for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.68

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GE

5.01

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

GE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSGE
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.751.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.890.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.99
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.685.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. GE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. GE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.32%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GE

0.44%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

GE’s Dividend Yield of 0.44% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

15.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.03% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GE

16.78%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

GE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.78% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSGE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%0.44%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.03%16.78%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

34.95

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 34.95 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GE

38.26

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

At 38.26, GE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.28

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.28 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GE

7.13

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 7.13, GE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

5.08

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 5.08, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GE

14.26

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 14.26, GE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. GE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSGE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.9538.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.287.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.0814.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.9354.04