Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSFLR
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationFluor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization16.76 billion USD6.79 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973December 1, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSFLR
5-Day Price Return0.96%-7.02%
13-Week Price Return35.92%1.22%
26-Week Price Return47.20%9.34%
52-Week Price Return86.83%-15.78%
Month-to-Date Return4.62%-13.08%
Year-to-Date Return94.74%-14.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.66M4.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M4.07M
3-Month Volatility56.37%40.80%
Beta1.321.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

22.68%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.65%
Q3
18.32%
Median
9.95%
Q1
1.68%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 22.68% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.67%
Median
11.05%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-2.38%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

14.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
46.52%
Q3
20.04%
Median
7.57%
Q1
1.57%
Min
-25.46%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 14.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.49%
Median
3.88%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-2.27%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

19.41%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
72.27%
Q3
33.90%
Median
14.82%
Q1
2.88%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.41% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.70%
Median
5.84%
Q1
3.94%
Min
-1.78%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)22.68%105.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.19%45.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.30%25.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.41%1.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.95%3.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

4.44

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.84
Median
1.95
Q1
1.40
Min
0.41

CRS’s Current Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.26
Q3
1.54
Median
1.25
Q1
0.99
Min
0.65

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.36

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.49
Median
0.31
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.33
Median
0.64
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
21.58
Median
5.63
Q1
0.75
Min
-24.82

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
30.69
Q3
15.27
Median
7.88
Q1
4.27
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSFLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.441.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.371.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.14--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.24%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
7.02%
Q3
2.91%
Median
1.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.24% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.25%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.17%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

12.66%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
151.02%
Q3
64.89%
Median
32.13%
Q1
7.15%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.66% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
144.77%
Q3
74.39%
Median
50.47%
Q1
8.02%
Min
0.00%

FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.24%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.66%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

40.53

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
77.73
Q3
39.76
Median
20.87
Q1
13.12
Min
2.01

A P/E Ratio of 40.53 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLR

1.65

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
39.16
Q3
24.60
Median
17.05
Q1
13.85
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.65 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.80

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.17
Q3
4.39
Median
2.43
Q1
0.91
Min
0.15

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 5.80 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR

0.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.52
Median
0.80
Q1
0.48
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.42 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

6.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.38
Q3
3.01
Median
1.72
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

At 6.40, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
3.97
Median
1.90
Q1
1.22
Min
0.24

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRS vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.531.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.800.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.401.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)58.617.23