Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. EMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and EMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSEMR
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationEmerson Electric Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization12.45 billion USD75.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and EMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. EMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSEMR
5-Day Price Return-1.73%1.63%
13-Week Price Return15.44%13.06%
26-Week Price Return31.61%5.90%
52-Week Price Return79.73%30.98%
Month-to-Date Return0.32%-7.22%
Year-to-Date Return47.42%8.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.15M4.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M3.30M
3-Month Volatility36.32%23.55%
Beta1.521.30

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.09%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

12.26%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

16.39%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.39% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSEMR
Return on Equity (TTM)21.09%13.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.82%6.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%14.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.39%17.42%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.52%52.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.75

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.75 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.39

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.68

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSEMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.750.85
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.890.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.6818.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. EMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. EMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.32%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR

1.59%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.59%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

15.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.03% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSEMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%1.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.03%45.06%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

34.95

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 34.95 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EMR

28.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.34 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.28

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.28 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EMR

4.23

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

5.08

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 5.08, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRS vs. EMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSEMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.9528.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.284.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.083.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.9327.42