Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMUBER
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareGround Transportation
Market Capitalization226.60 billion USD189.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 23, 2004May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMUBER
5-Day Price Return-1.60%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return-17.93%3.10%
26-Week Price Return-28.35%29.78%
52-Week Price Return-5.68%31.14%
Month-to-Date Return-8.25%3.51%
Year-to-Date Return-29.10%50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.49M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.42M21.23M
3-Month Volatility26.02%32.88%
Beta1.221.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

10.43%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 10.43% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.08%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.10% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)10.43%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.44%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.10%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.34%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.07

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.071.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.980.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.140.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.86-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.71%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

25.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 25.00%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.71%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

35.45

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 35.45 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

5.70

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.25

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.25 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.4514.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.704.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.258.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.3922.17