Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMTSLA
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySoftwareAutomobiles
Market Capitalization230.46 billion USD1,527.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 23, 2004June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMTSLA
5-Day Price Return-2.18%0.44%
13-Week Price Return-13.32%40.00%
26-Week Price Return-15.16%63.46%
52-Week Price Return-13.89%70.74%
Month-to-Date Return-0.55%33.20%
Year-to-Date Return-29.50%10.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.34M91.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.65M97.49M
3-Month Volatility26.84%46.51%
Beta1.252.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

11.03%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 11.03% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.87%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.87% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.89%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.89% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)11.03%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.87%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.89%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.65%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.12

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.122.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.011.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.140.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.8671.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.68%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

23.50%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.50%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.68%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.50%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

34.61

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 34.61 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TSLA

252.02

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

At 252.02, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

5.84

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TSLA

16.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 16.48, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.03

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.03 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.61252.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.8416.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0313.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.45273.50