Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. TMUS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and TMUS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMTMUS
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.T-Mobile US, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustrySoftwareWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization235.61 billion USD291.50 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 23, 2004April 19, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and TMUS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. TMUS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMTMUS
5-Day Price Return5.60%3.48%
13-Week Price Return-14.32%6.04%
26-Week Price Return-25.28%-2.29%
52-Week Price Return-7.13%31.09%
Month-to-Date Return-4.60%8.64%
Year-to-Date Return-26.29%17.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.91M3.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.34M4.42M
3-Month Volatility25.55%23.46%
Beta1.230.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

10.43%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 10.43% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TMUS

19.69%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, TMUS’s Return on Equity of 19.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.08%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TMUS

14.53%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.53% places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.10% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TMUS

23.08%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

TMUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMTMUS
Return on Equity (TTM)10.43%19.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.44%5.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%14.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.10%23.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.34%63.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.07

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TMUS

1.21

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

TMUS’s Current Ratio of 1.21 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TMUS

1.45

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

TMUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TMUS

5.31

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

TMUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMTMUS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.071.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.981.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.141.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.865.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.66%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

TMUS

1.29%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

25.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 25.00%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

TMUS

30.87%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.87% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMTMUS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%1.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.00%30.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

37.90

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 37.90 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TMUS

23.93

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

A P/E Ratio of 23.93 places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

6.09

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 6.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TMUS

3.48

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, TMUS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.25

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.25 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TMUS

4.43

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

TMUS’s P/B Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper tier for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMTMUS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.9023.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.093.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.254.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.5923.69