Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CRM is a standard domestic listing, while TM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCRMTM
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.Toyota Motor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySoftwareAutomobiles
Market Capitalization226.60 billion USD253.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 23, 2004March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMTM
5-Day Price Return-1.60%6.57%
13-Week Price Return-17.93%3.69%
26-Week Price Return-28.35%-3.99%
52-Week Price Return-5.68%14.38%
Month-to-Date Return-8.25%5.88%
Year-to-Date Return-29.10%-9.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.49M32.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.42M31.57M
3-Month Volatility26.02%37.96%
Beta1.221.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

10.43%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 10.43% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.08%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.10% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMTM
Return on Equity (TTM)10.43%12.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.44%4.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.10%9.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.34%19.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.07

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TM

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMTM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.071.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.981.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.141.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.86--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.71%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

TM

3.16%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.16% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

25.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 25.00%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.71%3.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.00%38.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

35.45

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 35.45 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TM

8.72

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

TM’s P/E Ratio of 8.72 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

5.70

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TM

0.77

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.25

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.25 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRM vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.458.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.700.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.251.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.3951.17