Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. QCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and QCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMQCOM
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization230.46 billion USD182.57 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 23, 2004December 13, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and QCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. QCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMQCOM
5-Day Price Return-2.18%-4.14%
13-Week Price Return-13.32%4.46%
26-Week Price Return-15.16%5.03%
52-Week Price Return-13.89%-2.22%
Month-to-Date Return-0.55%3.50%
Year-to-Date Return-29.50%8.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.34M8.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.65M7.94M
3-Month Volatility26.84%25.70%
Beta1.251.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

11.03%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 11.03% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QCOM

42.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s Return on Equity of 42.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.87%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.87% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QCOM

26.77%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places QCOM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.89%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.89% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QCOM

27.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

QCOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.54% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMQCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)11.03%42.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%20.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.87%26.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.89%27.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.65%55.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.12

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

QCOM

3.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

QCOM’s Current Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QCOM

0.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

QCOM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

QCOM

38.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

QCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMQCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.123.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.012.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.140.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.8638.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.68%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

QCOM

2.13%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.13%, QCOM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

23.50%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.50%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

QCOM

32.79%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QCOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.79% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMQCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.68%2.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.50%32.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

34.61

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 34.61 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

QCOM

15.38

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s P/E Ratio of 15.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

5.84

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QCOM

4.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

QCOM’s P/S Ratio of 4.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.03

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.03 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QCOM

6.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

QCOM’s P/B Ratio of 6.35 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMQCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.6115.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.844.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.036.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.4515.32