Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. LLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and LLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMLLY
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.Eli Lilly and Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyHealth Care
GICS IndustrySoftwarePharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization226.60 billion USD592.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 23, 2004June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and LLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. LLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMLLY
5-Day Price Return-1.60%3.06%
13-Week Price Return-17.93%-12.58%
26-Week Price Return-28.35%-24.11%
52-Week Price Return-5.68%-25.32%
Month-to-Date Return-8.25%-10.75%
Year-to-Date Return-29.10%-14.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.49M8.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.42M4.45M
3-Month Volatility26.02%41.63%
Beta1.220.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

10.43%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 10.43% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LLY

88.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

LLY’s Return on Equity of 88.36% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.08%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LLY

25.91%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.91% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.10% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LLY

32.37%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.37% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMLLY
Return on Equity (TTM)10.43%88.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.44%16.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%25.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.10%32.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.34%82.64%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.07

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LLY

1.28

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

LLY’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LLY

2.18

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

LLY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LLY

20.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

LLY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMLLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.071.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.980.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.142.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.8620.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. LLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. LLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.71%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

LLY

0.82%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Yield of 0.82% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

25.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 25.00%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

LLY

36.46%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.46% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMLLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.71%0.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.00%36.46%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

35.45

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 35.45 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LLY

44.55

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

At 44.55, LLY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

5.70

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LLY

11.54

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 11.54, LLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.25

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.25 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LLY

40.43

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

At 40.43, LLY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRM vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMLLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.4544.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.7011.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.2540.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.39305.94