Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMIONQ
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.IonQ, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization226.60 billion USD12.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 23, 2004January 4, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMIONQ
5-Day Price Return-1.60%1.78%
13-Week Price Return-17.93%25.30%
26-Week Price Return-28.35%-0.15%
52-Week Price Return-5.68%513.24%
Month-to-Date Return-8.25%3.36%
Year-to-Date Return-29.10%-1.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.49M22.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.42M21.86M
3-Month Volatility26.02%98.83%
Beta1.222.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

10.43%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 10.43% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IONQ

-67.52%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -67.52%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.08%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IONQ

-885.21%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -885.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.10% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IONQ

-700.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -700.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)10.43%-67.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.44%-57.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%-885.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.10%-700.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.34%54.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.07

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IONQ

7.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 7.76 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMIONQ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.077.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.987.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.140.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.86-23.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.71%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

25.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 25.00%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.71%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

35.45

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 35.45 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

5.70

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IONQ

233.58

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 233.58, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.25

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.25 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IONQ

9.68

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.45--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.70233.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.259.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.39--