Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. GRMN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and GRMN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMGRMN
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.Garmin Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesSwitzerland
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySoftwareHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization236.96 billion USD44.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 23, 2004December 8, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and GRMN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. GRMN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMGRMN
5-Day Price Return0.76%-0.31%
13-Week Price Return-12.54%15.45%
26-Week Price Return-23.62%-3.81%
52-Week Price Return-4.15%31.00%
Month-to-Date Return-4.05%6.38%
Year-to-Date Return-25.86%12.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.68M0.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.34M0.85M
3-Month Volatility25.33%24.96%
Beta1.221.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

10.43%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 10.43% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.08%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.10% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMGRMN
Return on Equity (TTM)10.43%19.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.44%16.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%23.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.10%26.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.34%58.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.07

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMGRMN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.073.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.981.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.140.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.8673.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.66%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

GRMN

1.36%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.36% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

25.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 25.00%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMGRMN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%1.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.00%38.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

37.90

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 37.90 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRMN

28.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 28.32 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

6.09

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 6.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRMN

6.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.57, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.25

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.25 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRM vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMGRMN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.9028.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.096.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.254.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.5939.42