Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMFTV
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.Fortive Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareMachinery
Market Capitalization226.60 billion USD16.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 23, 2004July 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMFTV
5-Day Price Return-1.60%2.70%
13-Week Price Return-17.93%-33.92%
26-Week Price Return-28.35%-38.97%
52-Week Price Return-5.68%-28.68%
Month-to-Date Return-8.25%1.67%
Year-to-Date Return-29.10%-35.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.49M5.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.42M3.85M
3-Month Volatility26.02%55.22%
Beta1.221.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

10.43%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 10.43% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.08%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.10% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)10.43%7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.44%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.10%17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.34%59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.07

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.070.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.980.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.140.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.866.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.71%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

25.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 25.00%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.71%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.00%14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

35.45

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 35.45 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

5.70

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.25

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.25 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRM vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.4521.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.702.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.252.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.3911.83