Seek Returns logo

CRM vs. FLEX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRM and FLEX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRMFLEX
Company NameSalesforce, Inc.Flex Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization229.51 billion USD22.26 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 23, 2004March 18, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRM and FLEX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRM vs. FLEX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRMFLEX
5-Day Price Return0.81%-5.74%
13-Week Price Return0.50%22.43%
26-Week Price Return-15.74%43.35%
52-Week Price Return-28.70%58.45%
Month-to-Date Return-6.43%-4.05%
Year-to-Date Return-27.12%56.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.35M3.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.36M3.83M
3-Month Volatility32.37%37.98%
Beta1.291.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRM

11.03%

Software Industry

Max
65.88%
Q3
22.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
-6.54%
Min
-41.05%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 11.03% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLEX

16.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s Return on Equity of 16.77% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

16.87%

Software Industry

Max
53.50%
Q3
20.30%
Median
9.60%
Q1
-4.98%
Min
-41.00%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.87% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLEX

3.33%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

FLEX’s Net Profit Margin of 3.33% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRM

18.89%

Software Industry

Max
61.99%
Q3
23.67%
Median
10.93%
Q1
-3.57%
Min
-40.19%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.89% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLEX

4.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

FLEX’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.73% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRMFLEX
Return on Equity (TTM)11.03%16.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%4.59%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.87%3.33%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.89%4.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)77.65%9.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

1.12

Software Industry

Max
4.01
Q3
2.27
Median
1.50
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLEX

1.30

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

FLEX’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.04
Q3
0.86
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLEX

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

FLEX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
33.82
Median
1.59
Q1
-10.48
Min
-71.23

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLEX

7.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

FLEX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.39 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRMFLEX
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.121.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.010.79
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.140.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.867.39

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRM vs. FLEX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRM vs. FLEX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRM

0.68%

Software Industry

Max
0.34%
Q3
0.17%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

FLEX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRM

23.50%

Software Industry

Max
12.76%
Q3
6.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.50%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

FLEX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRMFLEX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.68%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.50%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRM

34.81

Software Industry

Max
142.78
Q3
72.24
Median
36.21
Q1
24.24
Min
4.55

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 34.81 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLEX

25.16

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

FLEX’s P/E Ratio of 25.16 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRM

5.87

Software Industry

Max
20.79
Q3
12.71
Median
6.75
Q1
4.56
Min
0.87

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.87 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLEX

0.84

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s P/S Ratio of 0.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRM

4.03

Software Industry

Max
30.49
Q3
14.84
Median
8.09
Q1
4.32
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.03 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FLEX

2.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

FLEX’s P/B Ratio of 2.53 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRM vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRMFLEX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.8125.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.870.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.032.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.5618.50