Seek Returns logo

CRH vs. SUZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRH and SUZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CRH is a standard domestic listing, while SUZ trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCRHSUZ
Company NameCRH plcSuzano S.A.
CountryIrelandBrazil
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryConstruction MaterialsPaper & Forest Products
Market Capitalization74.06 billion USD11.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 13, 1989November 4, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRH and SUZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRH vs. SUZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRHSUZ
5-Day Price Return-3.03%1.41%
13-Week Price Return-2.05%-9.96%
26-Week Price Return12.08%-11.76%
52-Week Price Return9.38%-20.24%
Month-to-Date Return-8.28%-3.13%
Year-to-Date Return18.07%-23.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.87M6.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.93M4.74M
3-Month Volatility20.50%17.78%
Beta1.38-0.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRH

15.53%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
29.88%
Q3
15.53%
Median
10.48%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-5.22%

CRH’s Return on Equity of 15.53% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SUZ

20.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
5.87%
Q3
5.46%
Median
3.93%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-3.59%

SUZ’s Return on Equity of 20.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

9.30%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
36.53%
Q3
21.31%
Median
9.30%
Q1
4.87%
Min
-4.83%

CRH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SUZ

15.26%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
17.13%
Q3
10.06%
Median
3.43%
Q1
1.25%
Min
-4.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.26% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

13.84%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
37.17%
Q3
20.83%
Median
13.76%
Q1
8.68%
Min
-2.06%

CRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.84% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SUZ

26.63%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
14.51%
Median
6.22%
Q1
2.45%
Min
-5.63%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRHSUZ
Return on Equity (TTM)15.53%20.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.38%4.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.30%15.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.84%26.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.13%37.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

1.45

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.54
Q3
3.10
Median
2.01
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

CRH’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SUZ

3.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.98
Median
1.39
Q1
1.23
Min
1.07

SUZ’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

0.82

Construction Materials Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.82
Median
0.61
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

CRH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction Materials industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SUZ

2.28

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
0.91
Q3
0.80
Median
0.52
Q1
0.28
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, SUZ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Paper & Forest Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRH

11.05

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.24
Median
7.96
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

CRH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SUZ

0.53

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
14.16
Median
7.41
Q1
3.20
Min
-0.13

SUZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.53 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRHSUZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.453.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.992.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.822.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.050.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRH vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRH vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRH

1.34%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
6.67%
Q3
4.45%
Median
2.04%
Q1
0.79%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.34% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SUZ

4.24%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.31%
Q3
4.17%
Median
2.46%
Q1
2.21%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.24%, SUZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Paper & Forest Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRH

27.97%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
101.83%
Q3
76.08%
Median
37.66%
Q1
14.03%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.97% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SUZ

15.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
313.62%
Q3
193.66%
Median
83.21%
Q1
30.97%
Min
0.00%

SUZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.16% is in the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRHSUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.34%4.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.97%15.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRH

21.41

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.22
Q3
17.70
Median
13.01
Q1
7.35
Min
2.50

A P/E Ratio of 21.41 places CRH in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SUZ

7.58

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
34.02
Q3
24.22
Median
19.50
Q1
11.97
Min
7.58

In the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, SUZ’s P/E Ratio of 7.58 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRH

1.99

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
0.59
Min
0.21

CRH’s P/S Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SUZ

1.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.30
Median
0.86
Q1
0.54
Min
0.41

SUZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

3.45

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.26
Median
1.26
Q1
0.67
Min
0.11

CRH’s P/B Ratio of 3.45 is in the upper tier for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SUZ

1.50

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.25
Median
0.84
Q1
0.70
Min
0.28

SUZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper tier for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRH vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRHSUZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.417.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.991.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.451.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.7910.30