Seek Returns logo

CRH vs. CTVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRH and CTVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRHCTVA
Company NameCRH plcCorteva, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryConstruction MaterialsChemicals
Market Capitalization74.43 billion USD49.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 13, 1989May 24, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRH and CTVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRH vs. CTVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRHCTVA
5-Day Price Return-0.88%1.52%
13-Week Price Return12.29%6.03%
26-Week Price Return4.01%16.07%
52-Week Price Return30.35%34.34%
Month-to-Date Return16.05%1.15%
Year-to-Date Return19.73%28.09%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.56M4.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.51M3.85M
3-Month Volatility30.41%15.99%
Beta1.330.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRH

15.20%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

In the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, CRH’s Return on Equity of 15.20% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CTVA

5.68%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

CTVA’s Return on Equity of 5.68% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

9.09%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

CRH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CTVA

8.16%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

CTVA’s Net Profit Margin of 8.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

13.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

CRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.88% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CTVA

13.06%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

CTVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.06% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRHCTVA
Return on Equity (TTM)15.20%5.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.36%3.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.09%8.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.88%13.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.99%45.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

1.74

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

CRH’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTVA

1.68

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

CTVA’s Current Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

0.71

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CRH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTVA

0.14

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, CTVA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRH

11.05

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

CRH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTVA

4.45

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

CTVA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.45 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRHCTVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.741.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.111.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.710.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.054.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRH vs. CTVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRH vs. CTVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRH

1.30%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.30% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTVA

0.94%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

CTVA’s Dividend Yield of 0.94% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRH

28.69%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.69% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTVA

11.80%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

CTVA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.80% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRHCTVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.30%0.94%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.69%11.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRH

22.75

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

CRH’s P/E Ratio of 22.75 is within the middle range for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTVA

35.37

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 35.37 places CTVA in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRH

2.07

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

CRH’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTVA

2.89

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

CTVA’s P/S Ratio of 2.89 is in the upper echelon for the Chemicals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

2.77

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

CRH’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CTVA

1.96

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

CTVA’s P/B Ratio of 1.96 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRH vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRHCTVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.7535.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.072.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.771.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.5310.28