Seek Returns logo

CRDO vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRDO and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRDONTAP
Company NameCredo Technology Group Holding LtdNetApp, Inc.
CountryCayman IslandsUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization25.07 billion USD23.93 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 27, 2022November 21, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRDO and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRDO vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRDONTAP
5-Day Price Return-2.52%-3.89%
13-Week Price Return57.26%11.18%
26-Week Price Return223.94%27.72%
52-Week Price Return362.99%-2.29%
Month-to-Date Return18.33%5.03%
Year-to-Date Return116.65%2.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.06M2.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.39M2.08M
3-Month Volatility63.35%23.54%
Beta2.641.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRDO

18.89%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

CRDO’s Return on Equity of 18.89% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTAP

120.04%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 120.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRDO

20.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

CRDO’s Net Profit Margin of 20.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NTAP

17.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.77% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRDO

18.72%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

CRDO’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.72% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTAP

20.70%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.70% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRDONTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)18.89%120.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.29%12.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.85%17.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.72%20.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.98%70.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRDO

7.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

CRDO’s Current Ratio of 7.41 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NTAP

1.31

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRDO

0.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, CRDO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NTAP

2.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.55, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRDO

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

Interest Coverage Ratio data for CRDO is currently unavailable.

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRDONTAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)7.411.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)6.341.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--17.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRDO vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRDO vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRDO

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRDO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP

1.78%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.78% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRDO

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRDO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP

35.95%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.95% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRDONTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRDO

200.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

At 200.35, CRDO’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NTAP

20.21

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 20.21 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRDO

41.77

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

With a P/S Ratio of 41.77, CRDO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTAP

3.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.59 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRDO

25.20

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

At 25.20, CRDO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTAP

21.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 21.54, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRDO vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRDONTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)200.3520.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)41.773.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)25.2021.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)237.5914.27
CRDO vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison