Seek Returns logo

CRDO vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRDO and FOUR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRDOFOUR
Company NameCredo Technology Group Holding LtdShift4 Payments, Inc.
CountryCayman IslandsUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentFinancial Services
Market Capitalization20.79 billion USD7.97 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 27, 2022June 5, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRDO and FOUR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRDO vs. FOUR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRDOFOUR
5-Day Price Return1.13%8.13%
13-Week Price Return119.32%0.02%
26-Week Price Return52.10%-24.97%
52-Week Price Return338.88%23.46%
Month-to-Date Return8.59%-12.53%
Year-to-Date Return80.23%-13.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.88M3.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.86M1.88M
3-Month Volatility64.14%44.54%
Beta2.631.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRDO

8.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

CRDO’s Return on Equity of 8.62% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FOUR

21.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Return on Equity of 21.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRDO

11.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

CRDO’s Net Profit Margin of 11.95% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FOUR

6.11%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 6.11% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRDO

8.50%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

CRDO’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.50% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FOUR

7.53%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.53% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRDOFOUR
Return on Equity (TTM)8.62%21.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.42%3.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.95%6.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.50%7.53%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.77%30.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRDO

6.62

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

CRDO’s Current Ratio of 6.62 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FOUR

2.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRDO

0.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, CRDO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FOUR

2.34

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRDO

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

Interest Coverage Ratio data for CRDO is currently unavailable.

FOUR

14.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRDOFOUR
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.622.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.512.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--14.17

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRDO vs. FOUR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRDO vs. FOUR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRDO

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRDO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRDO

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRDO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRDOFOUR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRDO

398.42

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

At 398.42, CRDO’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FOUR

35.99

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 35.99 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRDO

47.60

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

With a P/S Ratio of 47.60, CRDO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FOUR

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRDO

12.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

CRDO’s P/B Ratio of 12.13 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FOUR

5.45

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 5.45 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRDO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRDOFOUR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)398.4235.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)47.602.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.135.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)383.8320.85