CRCL vs. MUFG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 26, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CRCL and MUFG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CRCL is a standard domestic listing, while MUFG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	CRCL	MUFG
Company Name	Circle Internet Group	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
Country	United States	Japan
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Financials
GICS Industry	Software	Banks
Market Capitalization	33.90 billion USD	177.53 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 5, 2025	April 2, 2001
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRCL and MUFG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRCL vs. MUFG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CRCL	MUFG
5-Day Price Return	-4.62%	-0.97%
13-Week Price Return	--	17.79%
26-Week Price Return	--	17.97%
52-Week Price Return	--	71.92%
Month-to-Date Return	-26.42%	8.55%
Year-to-Date Return	62.25%	24.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume	15.11M	53.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume	26.43M	45.12M
3-Month Volatility	--	26.43%
Beta	-5.55	1.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRCL

Software Industry

Max: 59.01%
Q3: 21.98%
Median: 7.15%
Q1: -11.12%
Min: -51.24%

Return on Equity data for CRCL is currently unavailable.

MUFG

9.14%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

MUFG’s Return on Equity of 9.14% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRCL

-8.98%

Software Industry

Max: 48.14%
Q3: 18.23%
Median: 5.60%
Q1: -9.22%
Min: -49.36%

CRCL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -8.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MUFG

25.66%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

MUFG’s Net Profit Margin of 25.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRCL

-2.10%

Software Industry

Max: 57.34%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 7.84%
Q1: -8.72%
Min: -51.37%

CRCL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.10%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MUFG

30.87%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

MUFG’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.87% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CRCL	MUFG
Return on Equity (TTM)	--	9.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)	--	0.46%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-8.98%	25.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-2.10%	30.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRCL

1.03

Software Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.31
Median: 1.45
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.24

CRCL’s Current Ratio of 1.03 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MUFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRCL

0.09

Software Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

CRCL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MUFG

4.75

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRCL

Software Industry

Max: 67.02
Q3: 19.86
Median: 0.70
Q1: -12.50
Min: -53.00

Interest Coverage Ratio data for CRCL is currently unavailable.

MUFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CRCL	MUFG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.03	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.03	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.09	4.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRCL vs. MUFG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRCL vs. MUFG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRCL

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.08%
Q3: 0.03%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRCL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MUFG

2.09%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

MUFG’s Dividend Yield of 2.09% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRCL

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 1.32%
Q3: 0.53%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRCL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MUFG

65.29%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

MUFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.29% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CRCL	MUFG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	65.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRCL

Software Industry

Max: 149.35
Q3: 100.21
Median: 47.97
Q1: 26.77
Min: 11.68

P/E Ratio data for CRCL is currently unavailable.

MUFG

13.68

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

A P/E Ratio of 13.68 places MUFG in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRCL

10.95

Software Industry

Max: 25.24
Q3: 13.52
Median: 8.15
Q1: 4.87
Min: 0.98

CRCL’s P/S Ratio of 10.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MUFG

2.18

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRCL

17.02

Software Industry

Max: 30.95
Q3: 14.91
Median: 7.75
Q1: 3.60
Min: 0.38

CRCL’s P/B Ratio of 17.02 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MUFG

1.18

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

MUFG’s P/B Ratio of 1.18 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRCL vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CRCL	MUFG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	13.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	10.95	2.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	17.02	1.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	65.02	4.45