CRBG vs. PYPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CRBG and PYPL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CRBG	PYPL
Company Name	Corebridge Financial, Inc.	PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	14.48 billion USD	60.14 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	September 16, 2022	July 6, 2015
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRBG and PYPL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRBG vs. PYPL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	PYPL
5-Day Price Return	-3.45%	-5.19%
13-Week Price Return	-13.82%	-9.27%
26-Week Price Return	-11.19%	-13.11%
52-Week Price Return	-5.33%	-28.06%
Month-to-Date Return	-10.57%	-9.33%
Year-to-Date Return	-2.71%	-26.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume	8.54M	14.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.04M	14.06M
3-Month Volatility	27.55%	35.85%
Beta	1.00	1.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRBG

8.04%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 34.42%
Q3: 16.76%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 3.90%
Min: -10.16%

CRBG’s Return on Equity of 8.04% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PYPL

24.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 34.42%
Q3: 16.76%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 3.90%
Min: -10.16%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, PYPL’s Return on Equity of 24.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRBG

5.64%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.33%
Median: 13.11%
Q1: 7.04%
Min: -8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, CRBG’s Net Profit Margin of 5.64% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PYPL

14.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.33%
Median: 13.11%
Q1: 7.04%
Min: -8.99%

PYPL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.96% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRBG

10.79%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 81.07%
Q3: 40.32%
Median: 19.93%
Q1: 10.20%
Min: -34.40%

CRBG’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.79% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PYPL

18.24%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 81.07%
Q3: 40.32%
Median: 19.93%
Q1: 10.20%
Min: -34.40%

PYPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.24% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	PYPL
Return on Equity (TTM)	8.04%	24.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.25%	6.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	5.64%	14.96%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	10.79%	18.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	41.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.36
Q3: 2.26
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PYPL

1.34

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.36
Q3: 2.26
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

0.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.11
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

PYPL

0.57

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.11
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

9.57

Financial Services Industry

Max: 140.54
Q3: 57.67
Median: 6.72
Q1: 1.93
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

PYPL

1,066.80

Financial Services Industry

Max: 140.54
Q3: 57.67
Median: 6.72
Q1: 1.93
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	PYPL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.81	0.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.57	1,066.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRBG vs. PYPL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRBG vs. PYPL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRBG

3.60%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.52%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.75%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRBG’s Dividend Yield of 3.60% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.52%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.75%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PYPL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

11.10%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 17.51%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRBG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.10% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 17.51%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PYPL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	PYPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.60%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	11.10%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

14.62

Financial Services Industry

Max: 46.13
Q3: 28.79
Median: 13.18
Q1: 9.14
Min: 0.47

CRBG’s P/E Ratio of 14.62 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PYPL

11.97

Financial Services Industry

Max: 46.13
Q3: 28.79
Median: 13.18
Q1: 9.14
Min: 0.47

PYPL’s P/E Ratio of 11.97 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

0.82

Financial Services Industry

Max: 9.71
Q3: 4.81
Median: 2.49
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

PYPL

1.79

Financial Services Industry

Max: 9.71
Q3: 4.81
Median: 2.49
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

1.27

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.21
Q3: 3.51
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

CRBG’s P/B Ratio of 1.27 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PYPL

3.17

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.21
Q3: 3.51
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

PYPL’s P/B Ratio of 3.17 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRBG vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	PYPL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	14.62	11.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.82	1.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.27	3.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	7.71	10.58