CRBG vs. EQH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CRBG and EQH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CRBG	EQH
Company Name	Corebridge Financial, Inc.	Equitable Holdings, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	18.38 billion USD	16.36 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	September 16, 2022	May 10, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRBG and EQH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRBG vs. EQH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	EQH
5-Day Price Return	2.77%	8.50%
13-Week Price Return	4.79%	1.24%
26-Week Price Return	2.71%	4.50%
52-Week Price Return	29.98%	42.81%
Month-to-Date Return	-4.05%	6.35%
Year-to-Date Return	14.00%	15.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume	6.90M	3.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.55M	2.69M
3-Month Volatility	26.70%	28.39%
Beta	0.98	1.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRBG

-2.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

CRBG has a negative Return on Equity of -2.73%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EQH

56.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

EQH’s Return on Equity of 56.77% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRBG

-2.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

CRBG has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.30%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

EQH

3.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRBG

4.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

CRBG’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.41% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EQH

17.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.41% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	EQH
Return on Equity (TTM)	-2.73%	56.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-0.09%	0.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-2.30%	3.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	4.41%	17.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	51.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH

1.35

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

0.92

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

EQH

8.49

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

9.57

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	EQH
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.92	8.49
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.57	1.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRBG vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRBG vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRBG

2.86%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRBG’s Dividend Yield of 2.86% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EQH

2.34%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 2.34% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

12.04%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRBG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.04% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	EQH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.86%	2.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	12.04%	21.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

P/E Ratio data for CRBG is currently unavailable.

EQH

34.13

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

A P/E Ratio of 34.13 places EQH in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

1.25

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

EQH

1.03

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

1.59

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

CRBG’s P/B Ratio of 1.59 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQH

6.66

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

EQH’s P/B Ratio of 6.66 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CRBG	EQH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	34.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.25	1.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.59	6.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	9.49	8.04