Seek Returns logo

CRBG vs. EQH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRBG and EQH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRBGEQH
Company NameCorebridge Financial, Inc.Equitable Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization17.61 billion USD15.32 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 16, 2022May 10, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRBG and EQH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRBG vs. EQH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRBGEQH
5-Day Price Return-1.06%-2.20%
13-Week Price Return-8.61%-8.10%
26-Week Price Return3.58%-1.79%
52-Week Price Return15.63%21.95%
Month-to-Date Return2.03%0.75%
Year-to-Date Return9.25%8.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.07M2.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.46M2.79M
3-Month Volatility23.57%25.66%
Beta0.941.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRBG

-2.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

CRBG has a negative Return on Equity of -2.73%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EQH

22.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Return on Equity of 22.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRBG

-2.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

CRBG has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.30%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

EQH

3.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRBG

4.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

CRBG’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.41% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EQH

17.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.41% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRBGEQH
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.73%22.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.09%0.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.30%3.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.41%17.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--51.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH

1.67

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

0.92

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

EQH

20.12

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

9.57

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRBGEQH
Current Ratio (MRQ)--1.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--1.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.9220.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.571.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRBG vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRBG vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRBG

2.99%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRBG’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EQH

2.48%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 2.48% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

12.04%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRBG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.04% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRBGEQH
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.99%2.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.04%21.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

P/E Ratio data for CRBG is currently unavailable.

EQH

31.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

A P/E Ratio of 31.95 places EQH in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRBG

1.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

EQH

0.97

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRBG

1.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

CRBG’s P/B Ratio of 1.59 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQH

14.84

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

At 14.84, EQH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRBG vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRBGEQH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--31.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.200.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.5914.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.0910.13