CR vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CR and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CR is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	CR	PAC
Company Name	Crane Company	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Country	United States	Mexico
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Machinery	Transportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	10.49 billion USD	11.13 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 29, 2023	February 27, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CR and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CR vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CR	PAC
5-Day Price Return	-3.45%	3.15%
13-Week Price Return	-2.90%	-13.20%
26-Week Price Return	4.44%	-5.98%
52-Week Price Return	4.40%	11.39%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.32%	5.22%
Year-to-Date Return	21.05%	10.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.24M	0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.28M	0.71M
3-Month Volatility	23.05%	23.93%
Beta	1.27	1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CR

20.19%

Machinery Industry

Max: 30.85%
Q3: 19.99%
Median: 12.37%
Q1: 8.44%
Min: -7.69%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, CR’s Return on Equity of 20.19% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PAC

45.58%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 14.62%
Median: 10.37%
Q1: 6.63%
Min: 1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 45.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CR

16.13%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.28%
Q3: 10.99%
Median: 7.89%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -1.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.13% places CR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAC

24.13%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 56.87%
Q3: 31.71%
Median: 20.37%
Q1: 10.09%
Min: 1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 24.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CR

17.06%

Machinery Industry

Max: 27.20%
Q3: 15.91%
Median: 11.33%
Q1: 7.73%
Min: 0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.06% places CR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

41.95%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.60%
Q3: 47.00%
Median: 32.11%
Q1: 16.08%
Min: 1.73%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.95% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CR	PAC
Return on Equity (TTM)	20.19%	45.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)	14.17%	12.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	16.13%	24.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.06%	41.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	40.41%	100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CR

3.27

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.27
Q3: 2.16
Median: 1.75
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.70

CR’s Current Ratio of 3.27 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PAC

1.29

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 2.77
Q3: 1.91
Median: 1.29
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CR

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.45
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PAC

2.53

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.23
Q3: 1.64
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.53. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CR

16.60

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 36.46
Median: 13.55
Q1: 7.73
Min: -1.43

CR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.45
Median: 7.97
Q1: 4.97
Min: 2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CR	PAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.27	1.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.26	1.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	2.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	16.60	5.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

CR vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CR vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CR

0.50%

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.98%
Q3: 2.83%
Median: 1.89%
Q1: 1.17%
Min: 0.00%

CR’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PAC

5.32%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 7.92%
Q3: 5.23%
Median: 2.46%
Q1: 1.94%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.32%, PAC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CR

14.07%

Machinery Industry

Max: 209.29%
Q3: 102.41%
Median: 62.34%
Q1: 29.36%
Min: 0.00%

CR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.07% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PAC

128.34%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 206.16%
Q3: 111.39%
Median: 75.06%
Q1: 37.58%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 128.34% is in the upper quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CR	PAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.50%	5.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	14.07%	128.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CR

28.15

Machinery Industry

Max: 46.28
Q3: 29.52
Median: 24.18
Q1: 16.92
Min: 7.99

CR’s P/E Ratio of 28.15 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

17.45

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 37.73
Q3: 26.09
Median: 18.07
Q1: 13.50
Min: 6.41

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 17.45 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CR

4.54

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.25
Q3: 2.82
Median: 1.74
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.27

CR’s P/S Ratio of 4.54 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC

4.21

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 8.65
Q3: 5.45
Median: 3.16
Q1: 1.76
Min: 0.86

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CR

5.39

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.18
Q3: 4.18
Median: 2.71
Q1: 1.54
Min: 0.52

CR’s P/B Ratio of 5.39 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PAC

8.66

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.71
Q3: 3.00
Median: 2.04
Q1: 1.16
Min: 0.38

At 8.66, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CR	PAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	28.15	17.45
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.54	4.21
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.39	8.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	16.78	21.74