Seek Returns logo

CR vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CR and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRGFL
Company NameCrane CompanyGFL Environmental Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization10.93 billion USD18.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 29, 2023March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CR and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CR vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRGFL
5-Day Price Return-0.51%-0.69%
13-Week Price Return6.78%-0.10%
26-Week Price Return12.68%5.17%
52-Week Price Return27.01%21.85%
Month-to-Date Return-2.95%-1.13%
Year-to-Date Return25.21%7.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M0.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.31M0.36M
3-Month Volatility22.95%21.45%
Beta1.260.65

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CR

20.52%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, CR’s Return on Equity of 20.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CR

15.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.46% places CR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CR

16.42%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.42% places CR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)20.52%48.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.49%18.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.46%49.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.42%5.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.69%20.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CR

2.93

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

CR’s Current Ratio of 2.93 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CR

0.03

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CR

16.60

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

CR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.930.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.980.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.60-0.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

CR vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CR vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CR

0.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

CR’s Dividend Yield of 0.46% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GFL

0.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.12% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CR

14.18%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

CR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.18% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.46%0.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.18%0.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CR

31.08

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

CR’s P/E Ratio of 31.08 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL

7.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 7.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CR

4.80

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

CR’s P/S Ratio of 4.80 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFL

3.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CR

5.79

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

CR’s P/B Ratio of 5.79 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.087.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.803.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.793.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.6976.39