Seek Returns logo

CR vs. CSL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CR and CSL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRCSL
Company NameCrane CompanyCarlisle Companies Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryBuilding Products
Market Capitalization10.93 billion USD16.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 29, 2023February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CR and CSL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CR vs. CSL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRCSL
5-Day Price Return-0.51%-1.93%
13-Week Price Return6.78%-5.50%
26-Week Price Return12.68%6.39%
52-Week Price Return27.01%-6.00%
Month-to-Date Return-2.95%8.16%
Year-to-Date Return25.21%4.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M0.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.31M0.45M
3-Month Volatility22.95%40.87%
Beta1.261.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CR

20.52%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, CR’s Return on Equity of 20.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CR

15.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.46% places CR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CR

16.42%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.42% places CR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRCSL
Return on Equity (TTM)20.52%33.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.49%13.86%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.46%16.12%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.42%21.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.69%36.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CR

2.93

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

CR’s Current Ratio of 2.93 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CR

0.03

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CR

16.60

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

CR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRCSL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.932.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.981.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.6086.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

CR vs. CSL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CR vs. CSL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CR

0.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

CR’s Dividend Yield of 0.46% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CSL

1.09%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.09% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CR

14.18%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

CR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.18% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRCSL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.46%1.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.18%22.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CR

31.08

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

CR’s P/E Ratio of 31.08 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL

20.40

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 20.40 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CR

4.80

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

CR’s P/S Ratio of 4.80 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CSL

3.29

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 3.29 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CR

5.79

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

CR’s P/B Ratio of 5.79 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CR vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRCSL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.0820.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.803.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.797.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.6918.57