Seek Returns logo

CPT vs. SUI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CPT and SUI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both CPT and SUI are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolCPTSUI
Company NameCamden Property TrustSun Communities, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsResidential REITs
Market Capitalization11.31 billion USD16.78 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 1993December 9, 1993
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CPT and SUI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CPT vs. SUI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPTSUI
5-Day Price Return-0.43%0.80%
13-Week Price Return-6.53%1.98%
26-Week Price Return-13.41%-0.70%
52-Week Price Return-14.52%-5.13%
Month-to-Date Return-1.11%1.68%
Year-to-Date Return-9.01%4.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.91M0.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.93M0.95M
3-Month Volatility19.06%21.03%
Beta0.850.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CPT

3.35%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
17.50%
Q3
9.60%
Median
6.78%
Q1
3.88%
Min
-0.69%

CPT’s Return on Equity of 3.35% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SUI

17.50%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
17.50%
Q3
9.60%
Median
6.78%
Q1
3.88%
Min
-0.69%

In the upper quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s Return on Equity of 17.50% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CPT

9.99%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
53.28%
Q3
43.51%
Median
25.98%
Q1
9.99%
Min
-0.30%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

SUI

47.05%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
53.28%
Q3
43.51%
Median
25.98%
Q1
9.99%
Min
-0.30%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CPT

7.63%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.66%
Q3
47.76%
Median
29.76%
Q1
18.99%
Min
-0.66%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

SUI

-0.66%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.66%
Q3
47.76%
Median
29.76%
Q1
18.99%
Min
-0.66%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPTSUI
Return on Equity (TTM)3.35%17.50%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.74%8.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.99%47.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.63%-0.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.19%49.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

0.10

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.56
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

CPT’s Current Ratio of 0.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SUI

4.21

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.56
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

SUI’s Current Ratio of 4.21 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

0.83

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.68
Min
0.28

CPT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SUI

0.56

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.68
Min
0.28

Falling into the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CPT

1.14

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, CPT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.14 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SUI

1.17

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPTSUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.104.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.103.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.830.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.141.17

Growth

Revenue Growth

CPT vs. SUI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CPT vs. SUI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CPT

3.02%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.67%
Q3
4.30%
Median
3.71%
Q1
3.53%
Min
3.04%

CPT’s Dividend Yield of 3.02% is below the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

SUI

6.33%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.67%
Q3
4.30%
Median
3.71%
Q1
3.53%
Min
3.04%

SUI’s Dividend Yield of 6.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CPT

214.13%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
214.13%
Q3
138.72%
Median
103.63%
Q1
84.15%
Min
22.05%

CPT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 214.13% is in the upper quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SUI

49.16%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
214.13%
Q3
138.72%
Median
103.63%
Q1
84.15%
Min
22.05%

SUI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPTSUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.02%6.33%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)214.13%49.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CPT

96.90

Residential REITs Industry

Max
76.72
Q3
44.45
Median
28.89
Q1
22.94
Min
9.90

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

SUI

12.35

Residential REITs Industry

Max
76.72
Q3
44.45
Median
28.89
Q1
22.94
Min
9.90

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CPT

9.69

Residential REITs Industry

Max
13.08
Q3
9.23
Median
7.38
Q1
6.12
Min
5.65

CPT’s P/S Ratio of 9.69 is in the upper echelon for the Residential REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SUI

5.81

Residential REITs Industry

Max
13.08
Q3
9.23
Median
7.38
Q1
6.12
Min
5.65

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s P/S Ratio of 5.81 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

2.62

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.62
Median
2.08
Q1
1.46
Min
0.68

CPT’s P/B Ratio of 2.62 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SUI

2.11

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.62
Median
2.08
Q1
1.46
Min
0.68

SUI’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CPT vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPTSUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)96.9012.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.695.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.622.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.4820.50