Seek Returns logo

CPT vs. ESS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CPT and ESS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both CPT and ESS are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolCPTESS
Company NameCamden Property TrustEssex Property Trust, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsResidential REITs
Market Capitalization11.43 billion USD17.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 1993June 7, 1994
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CPT and ESS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CPT vs. ESS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPTESS
5-Day Price Return0.03%0.67%
13-Week Price Return-10.05%-9.63%
26-Week Price Return-9.09%-13.20%
52-Week Price Return-10.49%-8.12%
Month-to-Date Return-2.01%-0.56%
Year-to-Date Return-7.79%-9.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.14M0.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.02M0.51M
3-Month Volatility18.98%25.66%
Beta0.830.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CPT

3.35%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.21%
Q3
9.45%
Median
7.42%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.37%

CPT’s Return on Equity of 3.35% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ESS

14.44%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.21%
Q3
9.45%
Median
7.42%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.37%

ESS’s Return on Equity of 14.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CPT

9.99%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
67.49%
Q3
38.86%
Median
25.74%
Q1
7.62%
Min
0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

ESS

43.51%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
67.49%
Q3
38.86%
Median
25.74%
Q1
7.62%
Min
0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CPT

7.63%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.06%
Q3
45.82%
Median
29.89%
Q1
19.34%
Min
5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

ESS

52.69%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.06%
Q3
45.82%
Median
29.89%
Q1
19.34%
Min
5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPTESS
Return on Equity (TTM)3.35%14.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.74%6.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.99%43.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.63%52.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.19%70.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

0.10

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.28
Q3
0.64
Median
0.21
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CPT’s Current Ratio of 0.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ESS

0.71

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.28
Q3
0.64
Median
0.21
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

ESS’s Current Ratio of 0.71 is in the upper quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

0.83

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.69
Min
0.28

CPT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ESS

1.20

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.69
Min
0.28

ESS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Residential REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CPT

1.14

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, CPT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.14 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ESS

8.86

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.86, ESS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPTESS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.100.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.100.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.831.20
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.148.86

Growth

Revenue Growth

CPT vs. ESS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CPT vs. ESS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CPT

3.08%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.21%
Q3
3.83%
Median
3.40%
Q1
3.27%
Min
2.80%

CPT’s Dividend Yield of 3.08% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ESS

3.90%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.21%
Q3
3.83%
Median
3.40%
Q1
3.27%
Min
2.80%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.90%, ESS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Residential REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CPT

214.13%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
210.87%
Q3
145.45%
Median
102.94%
Q1
84.58%
Min
17.15%

At 214.13%, CPT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

ESS

79.64%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
210.87%
Q3
145.45%
Median
102.94%
Q1
84.58%
Min
17.15%

ESS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.64% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPTESS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.08%3.90%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)214.13%79.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CPT

95.15

Residential REITs Industry

Max
177.01
Q3
109.22
Median
31.26
Q1
25.84
Min
8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

ESS

20.44

Residential REITs Industry

Max
177.01
Q3
109.22
Median
31.26
Q1
25.84
Min
8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CPT

9.51

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
10.33
Median
8.01
Q1
6.55
Min
5.06

CPT’s P/S Ratio of 9.51 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ESS

8.89

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
10.33
Median
8.01
Q1
6.55
Min
5.06

ESS’s P/S Ratio of 8.89 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

2.62

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.83
Median
2.20
Q1
1.42
Min
0.67

CPT’s P/B Ratio of 2.62 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ESS

3.24

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.83
Median
2.20
Q1
1.42
Min
0.67

ESS’s P/B Ratio of 3.24 is in the upper tier for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CPT vs. ESS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPTESS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)95.1520.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.518.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.623.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)35.8270.96