Seek Returns logo

CPRT vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CPRT and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPRTLULU
Company NameCopart, Inc.lululemon athletica inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization43.48 billion USD20.73 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1994July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CPRT and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CPRT vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPRTLULU
5-Day Price Return0.81%-1.90%
13-Week Price Return-5.69%-25.89%
26-Week Price Return-20.67%-31.62%
52-Week Price Return-14.84%-35.84%
Month-to-Date Return-0.09%-1.75%
Year-to-Date Return-21.71%-54.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.39M3.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.13M4.69M
3-Month Volatility20.04%49.37%
Beta1.131.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CPRT

18.18%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, CPRT’s Return on Equity of 18.18% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LULU

42.05%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CPRT

33.41%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CPRT’s Net Profit Margin of 33.41% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LULU

16.38%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CPRT

36.51%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

CPRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.51% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

LULU

22.88%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPRTLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)18.18%42.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.42%24.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)33.41%16.38%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.51%22.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)45.18%59.10%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

8.42

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CPRT’s Current Ratio of 8.42 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LULU

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

0.00

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, CPRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

81.35

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 81.35, CPRT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPRTLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)8.422.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)8.300.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)81.35-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

CPRT vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CPRT vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CPRT

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CPRT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CPRT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPRTLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

27.64

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

CPRT’s P/E Ratio of 27.64 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LULU

12.01

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

9.23

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 9.23, CPRT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LULU

1.97

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

4.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

CPRT’s P/B Ratio of 4.77 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LULU

5.37

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CPRT vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPRTLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.6412.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.231.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.775.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.8614.90