Seek Returns logo

CPRT vs. FLUT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CPRT and FLUT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPRTFLUT
Company NameCopart, Inc.Flutter Entertainment plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization43.65 billion USD45.08 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1994October 4, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CPRT and FLUT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CPRT vs. FLUT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPRTFLUT
5-Day Price Return1.14%-9.52%
13-Week Price Return-8.54%-8.81%
26-Week Price Return-20.29%15.68%
52-Week Price Return-14.32%10.16%
Month-to-Date Return0.31%0.91%
Year-to-Date Return-21.40%-0.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.86M2.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.29M2.48M
3-Month Volatility19.71%32.97%
Beta1.131.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CPRT

18.18%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, CPRT’s Return on Equity of 18.18% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CPRT

33.41%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CPRT’s Net Profit Margin of 33.41% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CPRT

36.51%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

CPRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.51% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPRTFLUT
Return on Equity (TTM)18.18%3.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.42%1.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)33.41%2.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.51%6.53%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)45.18%46.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

8.42

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CPRT’s Current Ratio of 8.42 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

0.00

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, CPRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

81.35

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 81.35, CPRT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPRTFLUT
Current Ratio (MRQ)8.420.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)8.300.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)81.351.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

CPRT vs. FLUT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CPRT vs. FLUT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CPRT

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CPRT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CPRT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPRTFLUT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

27.78

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

CPRT’s P/E Ratio of 27.78 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLUT

123.26

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

At 123.26, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

9.28

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 9.28, CPRT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FLUT

3.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

4.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

CPRT’s P/B Ratio of 4.77 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CPRT vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPRTFLUT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.78123.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.283.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.774.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)35.0454.42