Seek Returns logo

CPRT vs. EAT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CPRT and EAT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPRTEAT
Company NameCopart, Inc.Brinker International, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization46.07 billion USD7.00 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1994January 6, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CPRT and EAT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CPRT vs. EAT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPRTEAT
5-Day Price Return3.34%-1.32%
13-Week Price Return-23.34%8.09%
26-Week Price Return-19.50%-13.66%
52-Week Price Return-5.19%129.95%
Month-to-Date Return5.12%-0.14%
Year-to-Date Return-16.97%18.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.63M1.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.65M1.55M
3-Month Volatility28.46%39.65%
Beta1.071.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CPRT

18.20%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, CPRT’s Return on Equity of 18.20% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EAT

301.31%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

EAT’s Return on Equity of 301.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CPRT

32.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

CPRT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EAT

6.49%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 6.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CPRT

35.80%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

CPRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 35.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

EAT

8.62%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPRTEAT
Return on Equity (TTM)18.20%301.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.36%12.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.21%6.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)35.80%8.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.51%17.64%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

8.16

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CPRT’s Current Ratio of 8.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EAT

0.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.28 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

0.00

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, CPRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EAT

2.09

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.09 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

81.35

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 81.35, CPRT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

EAT

3.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.54 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPRTEAT
Current Ratio (MRQ)8.160.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)8.000.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)81.353.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

CPRT vs. EAT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CPRT vs. EAT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CPRT

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CPRT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EAT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CPRT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EAT

0.39%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPRTEAT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

30.84

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

CPRT’s P/E Ratio of 30.84 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EAT

21.53

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

EAT’s P/E Ratio of 21.53 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CPRT

9.93

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 9.93, CPRT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EAT

1.40

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CPRT

6.71

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

CPRT’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EAT

26.43

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 26.43, EAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CPRT vs. EAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPRTEAT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.8421.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.931.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.7126.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.6018.32