Seek Returns logo

CPNG vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CPNG and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPNGLULU
Company NameCoupang, Inc.lululemon athletica inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization51.90 billion USD24.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 11, 2021July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CPNG and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CPNG vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPNGLULU
5-Day Price Return2.37%4.89%
13-Week Price Return8.91%-34.09%
26-Week Price Return19.32%-51.32%
52-Week Price Return25.25%-16.36%
Month-to-Date Return-3.26%-0.02%
Year-to-Date Return29.53%-47.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.87M3.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.48M3.04M
3-Month Volatility23.57%53.70%
Beta1.181.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CPNG

8.42%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

CPNG’s Return on Equity of 8.42% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CPNG

1.13%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, CPNG’s Net Profit Margin of 1.13% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CPNG

2.24%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

CPNG’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.24% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPNGLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)8.42%43.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.23%25.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.13%16.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.24%23.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.87%59.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CPNG

1.09

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

CPNG’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CPNG

0.39

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

CPNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CPNG

-37.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

CPNG has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -37.55. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPNGLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.092.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.840.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-37.55-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

CPNG vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CPNG vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CPNG

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CPNG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CPNG

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CPNG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPNGLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CPNG

142.22

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

At 142.22, CPNG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LULU

13.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CPNG

1.61

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

CPNG’s P/S Ratio of 1.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU

2.25

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CPNG

11.61

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

At 11.61, CPNG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Broadline Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CPNG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPNGLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)142.2213.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.612.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.617.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)63.0815.24