Seek Returns logo

CPAY vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CPAY and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPAYJBL
Company NameCorpay, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization22.36 billion USD23.51 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 15, 2010May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CPAY and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CPAY vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPAYJBL
5-Day Price Return3.97%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return-9.46%35.45%
26-Week Price Return-18.73%32.18%
52-Week Price Return13.78%114.74%
Month-to-Date Return-2.00%-1.83%
Year-to-Date Return-6.45%52.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.67M1.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.52M1.42M
3-Month Volatility34.16%32.78%
Beta1.011.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CPAY

30.89%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, CPAY’s Return on Equity of 30.89% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CPAY

25.17%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

CPAY’s Net Profit Margin of 25.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CPAY

44.50%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 44.50% places CPAY in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPAYJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)30.89%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.63%3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.17%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)44.50%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.12%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CPAY

1.12

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CPAY

2.07

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CPAY

6.72

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPAYJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.120.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.010.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.072.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.7211.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

CPAY vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CPAY vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CPAY

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CPAY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CPAY

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CPAY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPAYJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CPAY

20.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

CPAY’s P/E Ratio of 20.81 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

40.82

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 40.82 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CPAY

5.24

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

JBL

0.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CPAY

5.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

CPAY’s P/B Ratio of 5.95 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CPAY vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPAYJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.8140.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.240.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.9514.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.6720.23