Seek Returns logo

CP vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CP and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPVRT
Company NameCanadian Pacific Kansas City LimitedVertiv Holdings Co
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization71.32 billion USD61.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 30, 1983August 2, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CP and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CP vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPVRT
5-Day Price Return3.35%11.79%
13-Week Price Return-4.68%25.31%
26-Week Price Return6.54%121.88%
52-Week Price Return-5.99%56.63%
Month-to-Date Return2.17%6.19%
Year-to-Date Return1.75%41.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.99M8.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.58M7.10M
3-Month Volatility20.54%46.69%
Beta0.602.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CP

8.97%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

CP’s Return on Equity of 8.97% is on par with the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CP

28.04%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.04% places CP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CP

36.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 36.35% places CP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)8.97%32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.87%8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.04%8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.35%13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)85.09%35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CP

0.93

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

CP’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CP

0.48

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, CP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CP

6.97

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

CP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.931.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.811.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.972.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

CP vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CP vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CP

0.76%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

CP’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT

0.08%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.08% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CP

17.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

CP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.72% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.76%0.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.72%6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CP

23.25

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

CP’s P/E Ratio of 23.25 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRT

75.75

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

At 75.75, VRT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CP

6.52

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 6.52, CP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRT

6.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 6.77 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CP

2.18

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

CP’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Ground Transportation industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.2575.75
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.526.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.1815.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.8749.53