Seek Returns logo

CP vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CP and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPMTZ
Company NameCanadian Pacific Kansas City LimitedMasTec, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization68.69 billion USD16.97 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 30, 1983February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CP and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CP vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPMTZ
5-Day Price Return0.70%3.34%
13-Week Price Return-3.46%24.87%
26-Week Price Return-1.02%73.41%
52-Week Price Return-10.39%73.30%
Month-to-Date Return-0.92%17.13%
Year-to-Date Return-0.41%56.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.01M0.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.57M0.91M
3-Month Volatility20.33%33.54%
Beta0.601.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CP

8.97%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

CP’s Return on Equity of 8.97% is on par with the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CP

28.04%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.04% places CP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CP

36.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 36.35% places CP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)8.97%9.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.87%2.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.04%2.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.35%3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)85.09%12.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CP

0.93

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

CP’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CP

0.48

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, CP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CP

6.97

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

CP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.931.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.811.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.972.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

CP vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CP vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CP

0.78%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

CP’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CP

17.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

CP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.72% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.78%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.72%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CP

22.75

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

CP’s P/E Ratio of 22.75 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTZ

62.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 62.85, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CP

6.38

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 6.38, CP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MTZ

1.28

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CP

2.18

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

CP’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Ground Transportation industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CP vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.7562.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.381.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.184.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.0418.12