Seek Returns logo

CP vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CP and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPMMM
Company NameCanadian Pacific Kansas City Limited3M Company
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization68.69 billion USD83.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 30, 1983January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CP and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CP vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPMMM
5-Day Price Return0.70%0.38%
13-Week Price Return-3.46%1.93%
26-Week Price Return-1.02%1.64%
52-Week Price Return-10.39%13.02%
Month-to-Date Return-0.92%-0.23%
Year-to-Date Return-0.41%20.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.01M2.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.57M3.18M
3-Month Volatility20.33%22.89%
Beta0.601.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CP

8.97%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

CP’s Return on Equity of 8.97% is on par with the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CP

28.04%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.04% places CP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CP

36.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 36.35% places CP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)8.97%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.87%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.04%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.35%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)85.09%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CP

0.93

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

CP’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CP

0.48

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, CP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CP

6.97

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

CP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.931.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.811.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.483.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.97-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CP vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CP vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CP

0.78%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

CP’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CP

17.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

CP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.72% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.78%1.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.72%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CP

22.75

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

CP’s P/E Ratio of 22.75 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

21.10

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.10 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CP

6.38

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 6.38, CP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MMM

3.38

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CP

2.18

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

CP’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Ground Transportation industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CP vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.7521.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.383.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.1818.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.0431.11