Seek Returns

COP vs. IMO: ConocoPhillips vs. Imperial Oil Stock Comparison

How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while IMO falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
Profile ItemCOPIMO
NameConocoPhillipsImperial Oil Limited
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionIntegrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization161.12 billion USD58.92 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE American
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP
IMO
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCOPIMO
Total Return (1Y)62.02%35.68%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)9.29%34.62%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.40%32.18%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COP
IMO
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCOPIMO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)31.63%30.00%
Beta (5Y)0.190.58
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.30%-29.72%
Avg. Volume (3M)6.60M573.33K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
COP and IMO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCOPIMO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.831.05
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.701.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.

COP

Energy industry group

17.66%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
COP
17.66%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max
53.85%
IMO
25.24%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

16.76%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
COP
16.76%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
IMO
10.88%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

30.05%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
COP
30.05%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
IMO
21.36%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCOPIMO
ROE (TTM)17.66%25.24%
ROA (TTM)8.98%10.93%
Net Margin (TTM)16.76%10.88%
Operating Margin (TTM)30.05%21.36%
Gross Margin (TTM)49.01%20.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCOPIMO
Revenue Growth (YoY)7.67%-7.42%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-9.11%-7.56%
EPS Growth (YoY)-18.69%-28.24%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-24.18%-17.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

COP

Energy industry group

1.52

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
COP
1.52
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
IMO
1.30
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

COP

Energy industry group

0.35

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
COP
0.35
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
IMO
0.17
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCOPIMO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.521.30
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.350.17
Net Debt / EBITDA0.450.13

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

COP

Energy industry group

2.48%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
COP
2.48%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
IMO
2.65%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

COP

Energy industry group

35.41%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
COP
35.41%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
IMO
26.49%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCOPIMO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.48%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.41%26.49%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

COP

Energy industry group

14.36

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
COP
14.36
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
IMO
13.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

COP

Energy industry group

2.34

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
COP
2.34
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
IMO
1.06
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

COP

Energy industry group

2.44

Max
4.21
COP
2.44
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
4.21
IMO
3.38
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCOPIMO
P/E Ratio (TTM)14.3613.78
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.341.06
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.443.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)7.12%9.90%