Seek Returns logo

COP vs. GLNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at COP and GLNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCOPGLNG
Company NameConocoPhillipsGolar LNG Limited
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization117.09 billion USD3.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981July 15, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of COP and GLNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

COP vs. GLNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCOPGLNG
5-Day Price Return0.40%-2.85%
13-Week Price Return-0.83%-6.03%
26-Week Price Return-1.57%13.15%
52-Week Price Return-18.28%-1.70%
Month-to-Date Return-0.89%-5.44%
Year-to-Date Return-5.47%-9.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.83M1.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.04M1.29M
3-Month Volatility23.63%26.77%
Beta0.350.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

COP

14.97%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

COP’s Return on Equity of 14.97% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLNG

-0.33%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

GLNG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.33%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

COP

15.89%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

COP’s Net Profit Margin of 15.89% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GLNG

-2.40%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

GLNG has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.40%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

COP

22.32%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

COP’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.32% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GLNG

-6.14%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

GLNG has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -6.14%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCOPGLNG
Return on Equity (TTM)14.97%-0.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.88%-0.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.89%-2.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.32%-6.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.81%54.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

COP

1.27

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

COP’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GLNG

1.47

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

GLNG’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

COP

0.36

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

COP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GLNG

1.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GLNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.03 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

COP

-1.97

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

COP has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.97. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GLNG

1.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, GLNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.01 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCOPGLNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.271.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.011.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.361.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1.971.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

COP vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

COP vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

COP

3.23%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

COP’s Dividend Yield of 3.23% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GLNG

2.59%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Yield of 2.59% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

COP

41.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

COP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 41.25% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GLNG

276.89%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

At 276.89%, GLNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCOPGLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.23%2.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)41.25%276.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

COP

12.79

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

COP’s P/E Ratio of 12.79 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GLNG

--

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

P/E Ratio data for GLNG is currently unavailable.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

COP

2.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

COP’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GLNG

15.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 15.01, GLNG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

COP

1.73

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

COP’s P/B Ratio of 1.73 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLNG

2.28

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

GLNG’s P/B Ratio of 2.28 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

COP vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCOPGLNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.79--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.0315.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.732.28
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.97146.19