COP vs. EQNR: ConocoPhillips vs. Equinor Stock Comparison
How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Equinor (EQNR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ConocoPhillips (COP) and Equinor (EQNR) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while EQNR falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
ConocoPhillips (COP) trades as ordinary local shares, while Equinor (EQNR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ConocoPhillips | Equinor ASA Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Norway |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 161.12 billion USD | 99.39 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | June 18, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 62.02% | 78.03% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.29% | 17.56% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.40% | 17.66% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.63% | 40.50% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.30% | -34.57% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.60M | 3.77M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.83 | 1.82 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.70 | 2.76 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 27.57% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for EQNR.
COP
Energy industry group
17.66%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- COP
- 17.66%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
EQNR
Energy industry group
27.57%
- Max
- 53.85%
- EQNR
- 27.57%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% and Equinor (EQNR) at 9.79% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
COP
Energy industry group
16.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- COP
- 16.76%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
EQNR
Energy industry group
9.79%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- EQNR
- 9.79%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 37.00% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
COP
Energy industry group
30.05%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- COP
- 30.05%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
EQNR
Energy industry group
37.00%
- Max
- 71.31%
- EQNR
- 37.00%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.66% | 27.57% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.98% | 17.10% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.76% | 9.79% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.05% | 37.00% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 49.01% | 43.18% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% and Equinor (EQNR) at 3.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% and Equinor (EQNR) at -37.62% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.67% | 3.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.11% | -10.78% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -18.69% | -37.62% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -24.18% | -40.11% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 and Equinor (EQNR) at 1.18 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
COP
Energy industry group
1.52
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- COP
- 1.52
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
EQNR
Energy industry group
1.18
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- EQNR
- 1.18
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 and Equinor (EQNR) at 0.66 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
COP
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- COP
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
EQNR
Energy industry group
0.66
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- EQNR
- 0.66
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.52 | 1.18 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.35 | 0.66 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.45 | 0.12 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 3.67% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, EQNR the richer one.
COP
Energy industry group
2.48%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- COP
- 2.48%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQNR
Energy industry group
3.67%
- Max
- 8.57%
- EQNR
- 3.67%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% and Equinor (EQNR) at 31.54% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
COP
Energy industry group
35.41%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- COP
- 35.41%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQNR
Energy industry group
31.54%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- EQNR
- 31.54%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.48% | 3.67% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 35.41% | 31.54% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 and Equinor (EQNR) at 8.71 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
COP
Energy industry group
14.36
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- COP
- 14.36
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
EQNR
Energy industry group
8.71
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- EQNR
- 8.71
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 0.82 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 prices around its industry’s middle — EQNR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
COP
Energy industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- COP
- 2.34
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
EQNR
Energy industry group
0.82
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- EQNR
- 0.82
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Equinor (EQNR) at 4.44 prices even higher, above its industry range.
COP
Energy industry group
2.44
- Max
- 4.21
- COP
- 2.44
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
EQNR
Energy industry group
4.44
- EQNR
- 4.44
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 14.36 | 8.71 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.34 | 0.82 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.44 | 4.44 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.12% | 32.55% |