Seek Returns logo

COO vs. DHR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at COO and DHR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCOODHR
Company NameThe Cooper Companies, Inc.Danaher Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization14.82 billion USD149.76 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 21, 1983December 29, 1978
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of COO and DHR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

COO vs. DHR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCOODHR
5-Day Price Return7.33%5.37%
13-Week Price Return-12.04%4.14%
26-Week Price Return-22.06%-0.41%
52-Week Price Return-18.36%-21.73%
Month-to-Date Return5.06%6.08%
Year-to-Date Return-19.21%-8.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.54M3.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.39M4.21M
3-Month Volatility39.47%30.98%
Beta1.030.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

COO

5.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

COO’s Return on Equity of 5.11% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DHR

6.69%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

DHR’s Return on Equity of 6.69% is on par with the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

COO

10.39%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

COO’s Net Profit Margin of 10.39% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DHR

14.21%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

DHR’s Net Profit Margin of 14.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

COO

19.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.00% places COO in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DHR

18.43%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

DHR’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.43% is around the midpoint for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCOODHR
Return on Equity (TTM)5.11%6.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.38%4.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.39%14.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.00%18.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.20%59.72%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

COO

2.10

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

COO’s Current Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DHR

1.62

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

DHR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

COO

0.31

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

COO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DHR

0.33

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

DHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

COO

5.87

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

COO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DHR

22.31

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

DHR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCOODHR
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.101.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.8722.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

COO vs. DHR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

COO vs. DHR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

COO

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

COO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DHR

0.55%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DHR’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

COO

2.41%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

COO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 2.41% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DHR

23.85%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DHR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.85% is within the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCOODHR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)2.41%23.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

COO

35.25

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

COO’s P/E Ratio of 35.25 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DHR

43.76

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

DHR’s P/E Ratio of 43.76 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

COO

3.66

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

COO’s P/S Ratio of 3.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DHR

6.22

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

DHR’s P/S Ratio of 6.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

COO

1.97

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

COO’s P/B Ratio of 1.97 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

DHR

2.72

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

DHR’s P/B Ratio of 2.72 is within the conventional range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

COO vs. DHR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCOODHR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.2543.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.666.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.972.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.9030.72