Seek Returns logo

COHR vs. SNOW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at COHR and SNOW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCOHRSNOW
Company NameCoherent Corp.Snowflake Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsIT Services
Market Capitalization17.72 billion USD65.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 2, 1987September 16, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of COHR and SNOW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

COHR vs. SNOW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCOHRSNOW
5-Day Price Return0.17%-4.62%
13-Week Price Return46.60%9.05%
26-Week Price Return13.49%5.63%
52-Week Price Return70.93%60.02%
Month-to-Date Return5.96%-11.91%
Year-to-Date Return20.35%27.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.07M5.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.31M4.55M
3-Month Volatility43.68%41.57%
Beta2.021.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

COHR

1.25%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

COHR’s Return on Equity of 1.25% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SNOW

-44.88%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

SNOW has a negative Return on Equity of -44.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

1.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Net Profit Margin of 1.73% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SNOW

-36.43%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

SNOW has a negative Net Profit Margin of -36.43%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

7.68%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

COHR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.68% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SNOW

-41.37%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

SNOW has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.37%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCOHRSNOW
Return on Equity (TTM)1.25%-44.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.67%-17.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.73%-36.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.68%-41.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.48%66.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

2.47

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

COHR’s Current Ratio of 2.47 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNOW

1.58

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

SNOW’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

0.48

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

COHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNOW

0.94

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

SNOW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.51

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

COHR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.51 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

SNOW

--

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCOHRSNOW
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.471.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.281.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.51--

Growth

Revenue Growth

COHR vs. SNOW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

COHR vs. SNOW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

COHR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNOW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

COHR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNOW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCOHRSNOW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

COHR

190.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

At 190.24, COHR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SNOW

--

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

P/E Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

COHR

3.28

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

COHR’s P/S Ratio of 3.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SNOW

16.99

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 16.99, SNOW trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

1.29

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

COHR’s P/B Ratio of 1.29 is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SNOW

22.13

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

At 22.13, SNOW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

COHR vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCOHRSNOW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)190.24--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.2816.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.2922.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)71.6788.65