Seek Returns logo

COHR vs. LITE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at COHR and LITE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCOHRLITE
Company NameCoherent Corp.Lumentum Holdings Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization18.31 billion USD11.57 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 2, 1987July 23, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of COHR and LITE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

COHR vs. LITE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCOHRLITE
5-Day Price Return3.44%-3.92%
13-Week Price Return27.86%80.33%
26-Week Price Return116.42%205.13%
52-Week Price Return22.58%142.44%
Month-to-Date Return8.31%0.23%
Year-to-Date Return23.16%94.27%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.95M2.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.64M2.94M
3-Month Volatility58.12%47.60%
Beta1.851.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

COHR

0.63%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

COHR’s Return on Equity of 0.63% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LITE

2.74%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

LITE’s Return on Equity of 2.74% is in the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

0.85%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Net Profit Margin of 0.85% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LITE

1.57%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, LITE’s Net Profit Margin of 1.57% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

6.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

COHR’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.08% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LITE

-10.95%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

LITE has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -10.95%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCOHRLITE
Return on Equity (TTM)0.63%2.74%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.34%0.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.85%1.57%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.08%-10.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.17%27.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

2.19

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

COHR’s Current Ratio of 2.19 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LITE

4.37

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

LITE’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

0.45

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

COHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LITE

2.27

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.27, LITE operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Communications Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

COHR

1.36

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.36 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LITE

4.46

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

LITE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCOHRLITE
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.194.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.052.87
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.452.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.364.46

Growth

Revenue Growth

COHR vs. LITE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

COHR vs. LITE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

COHR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LITE

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LITE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

COHR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LITE

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LITE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCOHRLITE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

COHR

364.52

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

At 364.52, COHR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LITE

438.01

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

At 438.01, LITE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

COHR

3.10

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

COHR’s P/S Ratio of 3.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LITE

6.90

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 6.90, LITE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

1.71

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

COHR’s P/B Ratio of 1.71 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LITE

5.81

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

LITE’s P/B Ratio of 5.81 is in the upper tier for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

COHR vs. LITE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCOHRLITE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)364.52438.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.106.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.715.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)70.221,123.21