Seek Returns logo

COHR vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at COHR and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCOHRJBL
Company NameCoherent Corp.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization17.72 billion USD23.51 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 2, 1987May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of COHR and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

COHR vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCOHRJBL
5-Day Price Return0.17%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return46.60%35.45%
26-Week Price Return13.49%32.18%
52-Week Price Return70.93%114.74%
Month-to-Date Return5.96%-1.83%
Year-to-Date Return20.35%52.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.07M1.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.31M1.42M
3-Month Volatility43.68%32.78%
Beta2.021.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

COHR

1.25%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

COHR’s Return on Equity of 1.25% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

1.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Net Profit Margin of 1.73% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

7.68%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

COHR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.68% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCOHRJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)1.25%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.67%3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.73%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.68%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.48%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

2.47

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

COHR’s Current Ratio of 2.47 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

0.48

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

COHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.51

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

COHR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.51 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCOHRJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.470.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.280.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.482.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.5111.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

COHR vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

COHR vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

COHR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

COHR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCOHRJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

COHR

190.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

At 190.24, COHR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JBL

40.82

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 40.82 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

COHR

3.28

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

COHR’s P/S Ratio of 3.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

1.29

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

COHR’s P/B Ratio of 1.29 is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

COHR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCOHRJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)190.2440.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.280.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.2914.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)71.6720.23