Seek Returns logo

COHR vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at COHR and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCOHRIONQ
Company NameCoherent Corp.IonQ, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization14.10 billion USD11.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 2, 1987January 4, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of COHR and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

COHR vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCOHRIONQ
5-Day Price Return3.12%5.11%
13-Week Price Return14.73%-15.53%
26-Week Price Return4.77%13.30%
52-Week Price Return15.60%429.14%
Month-to-Date Return-15.89%-2.98%
Year-to-Date Return-4.47%-7.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.61M14.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.50M21.08M
3-Month Volatility57.00%99.44%
Beta2.022.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

COHR

0.63%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

COHR’s Return on Equity of 0.63% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

IONQ

-67.52%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -67.52%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

0.85%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Net Profit Margin of 0.85% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

IONQ

-885.21%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -885.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

5.81%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

COHR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.81% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IONQ

-700.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -700.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCOHRIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)0.63%-67.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.34%-57.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.85%-885.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.81%-700.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.17%54.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

2.19

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

COHR’s Current Ratio of 2.19 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IONQ

7.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 7.76 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

0.45

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

COHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

COHR

1.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.39 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCOHRIONQ
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.197.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.057.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.450.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.39-23.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

COHR vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

COHR vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

COHR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

COHR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCOHRIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

COHR

272.15

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

At 272.15, COHR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

COHR

2.31

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

COHR’s P/S Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IONQ

208.53

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 208.53, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

1.71

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

COHR’s P/B Ratio of 1.71 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IONQ

9.68

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

COHR vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCOHRIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)272.15--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.31208.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.719.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)52.45--