Seek Returns logo

COHR vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at COHR and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

COHR is a standard domestic listing, while GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCOHRGDS
Company NameCoherent Corp.GDS Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsIT Services
Market Capitalization13.48 billion USD6.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateOctober 2, 1987November 2, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of COHR and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

COHR vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCOHRGDS
5-Day Price Return-5.56%-4.28%
13-Week Price Return9.03%11.79%
26-Week Price Return0.10%-4.13%
52-Week Price Return11.74%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return-19.56%-11.83%
Year-to-Date Return-8.64%37.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.86M10.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.51M8.68M
3-Month Volatility56.58%62.39%
Beta2.031.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

COHR

0.63%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

COHR’s Return on Equity of 0.63% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

0.85%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Net Profit Margin of 0.85% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

5.81%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

COHR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.81% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCOHRGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)0.63%19.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.34%5.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.85%41.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.81%21.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.17%21.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

2.19

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

COHR’s Current Ratio of 2.19 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

0.45

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

COHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

COHR

1.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.39 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCOHRGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.191.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.051.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.451.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.390.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

COHR vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

COHR vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

COHR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

COHR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCOHRGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

COHR

272.15

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

At 272.15, COHR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GDS

10.47

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 10.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

COHR

2.31

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

COHR’s P/S Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS

4.37

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.37 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

1.71

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

COHR’s P/B Ratio of 1.71 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS

1.41

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

COHR vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCOHRGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)272.1510.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.314.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.711.41
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)52.45--