Seek Returns logo

COHR vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at COHR and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCOHRFTV
Company NameCoherent Corp.Fortive Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsMachinery
Market Capitalization17.72 billion USD16.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 2, 1987July 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of COHR and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

COHR vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCOHRFTV
5-Day Price Return0.17%2.70%
13-Week Price Return46.60%-33.92%
26-Week Price Return13.49%-38.97%
52-Week Price Return70.93%-28.68%
Month-to-Date Return5.96%1.67%
Year-to-Date Return20.35%-35.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.07M5.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.31M3.85M
3-Month Volatility43.68%55.22%
Beta2.021.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

COHR

1.25%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

COHR’s Return on Equity of 1.25% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

1.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, COHR’s Net Profit Margin of 1.73% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

COHR

7.68%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

COHR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.68% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCOHRFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)1.25%7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.67%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.73%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.68%17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.48%59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

2.47

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

COHR’s Current Ratio of 2.47 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

0.48

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

COHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.51

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

COHR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.51 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCOHRFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.470.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.280.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.516.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

COHR vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

COHR vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

COHR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

COHR

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

COHR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCOHRFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

COHR

190.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

At 190.24, COHR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

COHR

3.28

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

COHR’s P/S Ratio of 3.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

COHR

1.29

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

COHR’s P/B Ratio of 1.29 is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

COHR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCOHRFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)190.2421.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.282.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.292.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)71.6711.83