Seek Returns logo

CNP vs. VST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNP and VST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNPVST
Company NameCenterPoint Energy, Inc.Vistra Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
Market Capitalization25.76 billion USD67.90 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNP and VST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNP vs. VST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNPVST
5-Day Price Return1.70%2.29%
13-Week Price Return8.89%3.46%
26-Week Price Return7.23%63.95%
52-Week Price Return30.23%51.31%
Month-to-Date Return1.70%2.29%
Year-to-Date Return24.36%45.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.19M5.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.38M4.85M
3-Month Volatility16.56%41.85%
Beta0.571.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNP

8.67%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
20.00%
Q3
13.79%
Median
9.45%
Q1
7.88%
Min
4.56%

CNP’s Return on Equity of 8.67% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VST

46.24%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
25.91%
Q3
13.69%
Median
7.86%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-6.69%

VST’s Return on Equity of 46.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNP

5.74%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
23.49%
Q3
14.79%
Median
9.24%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-1.05%

CNP’s Net Profit Margin of 5.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VST

14.92%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
23.58%
Q3
14.30%
Median
8.59%
Q1
5.08%
Min
-2.06%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNP

12.74%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
45.01%
Q3
26.69%
Median
19.18%
Q1
7.66%
Min
-0.18%

CNP’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.74% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VST

22.38%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
31.45%
Q3
22.28%
Median
16.08%
Q1
11.37%
Min
4.97%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.38% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNPVST
Return on Equity (TTM)8.67%46.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.14%6.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.74%14.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.74%22.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--8.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNP

0.79

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
1.10
Median
0.95
Q1
0.82
Min
0.48

CNP’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VST

0.90

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.25
Median
0.81
Q1
0.66
Min
0.27

VST’s Current Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the median group of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNP

1.96

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
3.03
Q3
2.00
Median
1.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.58

CNP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.96 is typical for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VST

4.00

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
4.71
Q3
2.80
Median
1.91
Q1
1.17
Min
0.18

VST’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNP

2.46

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
9.98
Q3
5.96
Median
3.48
Q1
2.74
Min
0.59

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.46 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VST

5.47

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
7.41
Median
2.59
Q1
1.32
Min
-1.62

VST’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNPVST
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.790.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.580.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.964.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.465.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNP vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNP vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNP

2.16%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
10.02%
Q3
5.84%
Median
4.22%
Q1
2.96%
Min
0.00%

CNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.16% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VST

0.74%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
5.56%
Median
3.97%
Q1
2.26%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Yield of 0.74% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNP

59.29%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
161.38%
Q3
101.19%
Median
73.21%
Q1
58.41%
Min
31.93%

CNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.29% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VST

14.95%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
113.12%
Q3
82.87%
Median
49.83%
Q1
22.46%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.95% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNPVST
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.16%0.74%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.29%14.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNP

27.39

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
27.93
Q3
20.57
Median
15.98
Q1
9.34
Min
5.25

A P/E Ratio of 27.39 places CNP in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VST

28.48

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
43.87
Q3
23.80
Median
10.75
Q1
8.70
Min
4.34

A P/E Ratio of 28.48 places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNP

3.41

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
5.00
Q3
3.46
Median
1.80
Q1
0.46
Min
0.26

CNP’s P/S Ratio of 3.41 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VST

4.25

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.59
Q3
3.75
Median
2.31
Q1
0.81
Min
0.42

VST’s P/S Ratio of 4.25 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNP

2.18

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.52
Q3
2.12
Median
1.55
Q1
1.25
Min
0.91

CNP’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VST

13.64

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
2.06
Median
1.40
Q1
0.88
Min
0.33

At 13.64, VST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CNP vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNPVST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.3928.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.414.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.1813.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.4544.07