Seek Returns logo

CNP vs. SMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNP and SMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNPSMR
Company NameCenterPoint Energy, Inc.NuScale Power Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesIndustrials
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization26.18 billion USD3.65 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 1, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNP and SMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNP vs. SMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNPSMR
5-Day Price Return0.66%-21.03%
13-Week Price Return4.25%-36.71%
26-Week Price Return8.40%3.74%
52-Week Price Return30.68%-10.13%
Month-to-Date Return3.92%-49.97%
Year-to-Date Return25.24%25.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.55M23.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.15M18.84M
3-Month Volatility13.88%113.58%
Beta0.582.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNP

9.49%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
20.00%
Q3
13.72%
Median
9.49%
Q1
7.74%
Min
-0.57%

CNP’s Return on Equity of 9.49% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SMR

-53.43%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.25%
Q3
23.48%
Median
11.69%
Q1
6.40%
Min
-4.39%

SMR has a negative Return on Equity of -53.43%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNP

5.74%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
22.58%
Q3
14.93%
Median
9.68%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-1.14%

CNP’s Net Profit Margin of 5.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SMR

-594.63%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.74%
Q3
10.52%
Median
6.30%
Q1
3.04%
Min
-0.75%

SMR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -594.63%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNP

12.74%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
45.31%
Q3
26.29%
Median
19.25%
Q1
7.66%
Min
-0.18%

CNP’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.74% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SMR

-983.96%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.16%
Q3
14.51%
Median
8.86%
Q1
4.72%
Min
-5.64%

SMR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -983.96%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNPSMR
Return on Equity (TTM)9.49%-53.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.34%-57.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.74%-594.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.74%-983.96%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--66.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNP

0.51

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.23
Q3
1.11
Median
0.93
Q1
0.87
Min
0.51

CNP’s Current Ratio of 0.51 falls into the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SMR

1.62

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.05
Median
1.44
Q1
1.14
Min
0.85

SMR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNP

2.02

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
3.16
Q3
2.03
Median
1.56
Q1
1.21
Min
0.58

CNP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02 is typical for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SMR

0.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.91
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, SMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNP

2.46

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
9.98
Q3
5.96
Median
3.48
Q1
2.74
Min
0.59

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.46 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SMR

-58.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
20.31
Median
9.84
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

SMR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -58.59. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNPSMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.511.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.361.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.020.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.46-58.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNP vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNP vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNP

2.17%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
6.29%
Q3
4.88%
Median
3.66%
Q1
2.95%
Min
1.67%

CNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.17% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.91%
Q3
1.66%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNP

54.92%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
110.63%
Q3
96.69%
Median
74.83%
Q1
57.12%
Min
31.93%

CNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.92% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
130.92%
Q3
64.56%
Median
37.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNPSMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.17%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)54.92%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNP

25.26

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
29.37
Q3
20.20
Median
17.94
Q1
10.63
Min
5.90

A P/E Ratio of 25.26 places CNP in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SMR

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
37.50
Median
23.51
Q1
19.68
Min
8.22

P/E Ratio data for SMR is currently unavailable.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNP

3.48

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
3.47
Median
2.06
Q1
0.49
Min
0.28

CNP’s P/S Ratio of 3.48 is in the upper echelon for the Multi-Utilities industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SMR

98.38

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.22
Q3
4.00
Median
1.70
Q1
1.04
Min
0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 98.38, SMR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNP

2.30

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.71
Q3
2.22
Median
1.53
Q1
1.27
Min
0.88

CNP’s P/B Ratio of 2.30 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SMR

12.38

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.81
Q3
5.42
Median
3.69
Q1
1.77
Min
0.78

At 12.38, SMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CNP vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNPSMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.26--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.4898.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3012.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.36--