Seek Returns logo

CNM vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNM and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNMVRSK
Company NameCore & Main, Inc.Verisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization12.94 billion USD36.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 22, 2021October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNM and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNM vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNMVRSK
5-Day Price Return2.43%-0.12%
13-Week Price Return23.21%-13.00%
26-Week Price Return18.61%-10.43%
52-Week Price Return34.03%0.70%
Month-to-Date Return3.17%-5.21%
Year-to-Date Return28.97%-4.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.78M1.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.00M0.96M
3-Month Volatility29.78%21.49%
Beta1.050.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNM

24.63%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, CNM’s Return on Equity of 24.63% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNM

5.47%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

CNM’s Net Profit Margin of 5.47% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNM

9.49%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

CNM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.49% is around the midpoint for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNMVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)24.63%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.80%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.47%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.49%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.57%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNM

1.96

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

CNM’s Current Ratio of 1.96 aligns with the median group of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNM

1.30

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

CNM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.30. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNM

5.06

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

CNM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNMVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.961.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.071.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.3010.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.0643.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNM vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNM vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNM

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

CNM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRSK

0.64%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNM

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

CNM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNMVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNM

31.11

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 31.11 places CNM in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VRSK

40.42

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 40.42 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNM

1.70

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

CNM’s P/S Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRSK

12.40

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.40, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNM

6.03

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

CNM’s P/B Ratio of 6.03 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CNM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNMVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.1140.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.7012.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.03139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3536.29