Seek Returns logo

CNM vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNM and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNMLMT
Company NameCore & Main, Inc.Lockheed Martin Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization12.94 billion USD103.32 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 2021January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNM and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNM vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNMLMT
5-Day Price Return2.43%2.74%
13-Week Price Return23.21%-6.47%
26-Week Price Return18.61%-1.33%
52-Week Price Return34.03%-20.53%
Month-to-Date Return3.17%5.13%
Year-to-Date Return28.97%-8.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.78M1.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.00M1.71M
3-Month Volatility29.78%32.09%
Beta1.050.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNM

24.63%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, CNM’s Return on Equity of 24.63% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNM

5.47%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

CNM’s Net Profit Margin of 5.47% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNM

9.49%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

CNM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.49% is around the midpoint for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNMLMT
Return on Equity (TTM)24.63%65.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.80%7.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.47%5.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.49%8.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.57%8.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNM

1.96

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

CNM’s Current Ratio of 1.96 aligns with the median group of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNM

1.30

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

CNM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.30. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNM

5.06

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

CNM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNMLMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.960.99
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.070.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.304.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.067.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNM vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNM vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNM

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

CNM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LMT

3.03%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNM

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

CNM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNMLMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%73.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNM

31.11

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 31.11 places CNM in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LMT

24.29

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.29 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNM

1.70

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

CNM’s P/S Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LMT

1.42

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNM

6.03

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

CNM’s P/B Ratio of 6.03 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CNM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNMLMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.1124.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.701.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.0320.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3520.49