Seek Returns logo

CNH vs. TDG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNH and TDG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNHTDG
Company NameCNH Industrial N.V.TransDigm Group Incorporated
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization15.23 billion USD79.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 30, 2013March 15, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and TDG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. TDG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNHTDG
5-Day Price Return0.25%-0.75%
13-Week Price Return-10.90%-2.63%
26-Week Price Return-2.25%4.96%
52-Week Price Return22.29%7.18%
Month-to-Date Return-6.02%-12.83%
Year-to-Date Return7.50%10.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.26M0.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume17.77M0.31M
3-Month Volatility28.62%29.15%
Beta1.551.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

10.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TDG

37.11%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, TDG’s Return on Equity of 37.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

4.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.55% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TDG

22.52%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

TDG’s Net Profit Margin of 22.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

17.85%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.85% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TDG

45.94%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

TDG’s Operating Profit Margin of 45.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNHTDG
Return on Equity (TTM)10.67%37.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.91%8.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.55%22.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.85%45.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.40%60.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.24

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.24 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TDG

3.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

TDG’s Current Ratio of 3.13 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.55, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TDG

5.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.41, TDG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TDG

2.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

TDG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNHTDG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.243.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.452.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.555.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.932.72

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. TDG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. TDG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.19%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.19% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TDG

5.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TDG’s Dividend Yield of 5.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

40.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.58% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TDG

891.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 891.68%, TDG’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNHTDG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.19%5.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.58%891.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

18.53

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

CNH’s P/E Ratio of 18.53 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TDG

40.76

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

TDG’s P/E Ratio of 40.76 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.84

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TDG

9.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 9.18, TDG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TDG

10.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

TDG’s P/B Ratio of 10.13 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CNH vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNHTDG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.5340.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.849.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.1010.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.8241.32